According to the businessinsider.com, three researchers from the Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Contracts (IC3) performed a study on the possibility of using the blockchain technology for online voting.
They have concluded that many governments are looking to making voting practices more convenient, increase voter turnout, and modernize practices through the blockchain technology.
However, the three researchers claim that blockchain can’t be the solution which will solve voting problems, but, in fact, has the potential to make them even worse.
Problems With Computers, Trust, Hackers, and Bribery
Ari Juels, a professor of computer science at Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, Ittay Eyal, professor of electrical engineering at Technion Israel Institute of Technology, and Oded Naor, a graduate student in electrical engineering at Technion Israel Institute of Technology, underlined a few potential problems with the voting system based on the blockchain.
“The stability and integrity of a democratic society itself are too important to be relegated to flawed computer systems,” the trio states for the businessinsider.com, emphasizing that even the renowned cryptographer, Ronald Rivest, has remarked that the best practices for internet voting are like the best practices for drunk driving – there’s no safe way to do either one.
Furthermore, they have pointed out that hackers, backed by political adversaries or foreign government, may present a serious threat to the integrity of one such voting system.
“A key method by which blockchain voting could worsen election integrity is by claiming to increase trustworthiness without actually doing so,” researchers declare as they explain that blockchain’s secure nature can’t be taken into consideration without considering unsafety of computers and mobile devices.
According to them: “A vote may be securely recorded, but that means nothing if the vote was miscast, to begin with.”
Simply put, if the voter’s phone was infected with malware that switches the vote from one candidate to the other, it doesn’t matter how secure the rest of the voting system is.
As the last point of failure, the three experts revealed their opinion that bribing a voter would become more likely to happen with the online voting system due to the high level of privacy one has when using the blockchain technology.
Researchers Trust the Blockchain Technology
Even though the IC3’s researchers deduced that blockchain isn’t the right solution for voting, they have a high level of belief in the blockchain technology.
“As researchers in the Initiative for CryptoCurrencies and Contracts, we believe in the transformative potential of blockchain systems in a number of industries,” the trio declared in their report and deduced that blockchains could do much more than allow strangers to send each other money without fear of fraud or tampering.
“They (developers) have created new ways for people to invest in technology ventures that have attracted billions of dollars, and may someday store records that make educational credentials, land ownership and food origins more transparent and harder to forge,” the trio concluded positively.
Is Tradition Also Failing?
Although the point that these experts are making is more than clear, we cannot help but ask ourselves if online voting would at least present an improvement.
Looking at George W. Bush’s sudden Hail Mary recount victory in Florida in 2000, or the low turnout of Macedonians to the referendum concerning the very name of their own country, we have to feel that the something is very wrong with the current system as well.
Would blockchain-based voting improve that system? This new world of blockchain and cryptos is constantly evolving, and while the trust is still being formed, they will still be subject to a lot of speculations.
Related post:
Thanks for your publiction. Another point is that being a photographer involves not only difficulties in taking award-winning photographs and also hardships in getting the best dslr camera suited to your needs and most especially hardships in maintaining the quality of your camera. This can be very real and noticeable for those photography fans that are straight into capturing the particular nature’s interesting scenes : the mountains, the actual forests, the wild or the seas. Going to these amazing places undoubtedly requires a digital camera that can live up to the wild’s unpleasant area.
You are my breathing in, I own few blogs and occasionally run out from to brand : (.
I love what you guys are usually up too. This type of clever work and coverage! Keep up the amazing works guys I’ve included you guys to blogroll.
Hi, Neat post. There’s a problem with your site in internet explorer, would test this? IE still is the market leader and a big portion of people will miss your magnificent writing due to this problem.
Hi, Neat post. There is a problem with your web site in internet explorer, would test this? IE still is the market leader and a large portion of people will miss your wonderful writing due to this problem.
Well I definitely enjoyed studying it. This tip offered by you is very constructive for good planning.
Thanks for the helpful posting. It is also my opinion that mesothelioma cancer has an incredibly long latency time period, which means that indication of the disease may well not emerge till 30 to 50 years after the first exposure to asbestos. Pleural mesothelioma, that is the most common sort and influences the area round the lungs, could cause shortness of breath, torso pains, plus a persistent coughing, which may cause coughing up blood.
This is a topic close to my heart cheers, where are your contact details though?
Probably one of the best articles i have read in long long time. Enjoyed it. Thank you for such nice post.
Hello theblockchainland.com webmaster, Your posts are always well-referenced and credible.